From notes@igc.apc.org Thu Aug 31 00:24:05 1995
Received: from cdp.igc.apc.org (192.82.108.1) by MediaFilter.org
 with SMTP (MailShare 1.0b10); Thu, 31 Aug 1995 00:24:07 -0500
Received: (from notes) by cdp.igc.apc.org (8.6.12/Revision: 1.204 ) id UAA24694 for "conf-zamir.chat"; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 20:46:37 -0700
Date: 30 Aug 1995 19:45:20
Reply-To: Conference "zamir.chat" 
From: CNAEF@CENTER.COLGATE.EDU
Subject: Re: AROUND SARAJEVO
To: Recipients of zamir-chat-l 
Message-ID: <01HUP8G4WEZIA4ZIG8@center.colgate.edu>
In-Reply-To: 
X-Gateway: conf2mail@igc.apc.org
Errors-To: owner-zamir-chat-l@igc.apc.org
Precedence: bulk
Lines: 6

From: CHARLES NAEF 

I do not appreciate anonymous postings, especially when they make some
interesting points.  My occasional postings are always identified at the
head of the message.  Why isn't that a general practice?
							Charles Naef