![]()
|
ALBANY-Under the angry eyes of 150 tenants up for a "mini-lobby day," the State Senate on April 7 rejected a move to extend the state's tenant pro-tections for four years. The 33-27 vote blocked a procedural maneuver by Minority Leader Martin Connor to get the Republican-controlled Senate to vote on renewing the rent laws unchanged. The Assembly passed a bill strengthening tenant protections last month, and tenant organizers saw Connor's discharge petition as a ploy to force Senate Republicans from the New York City area to show which side they're on. Given the choice between tenants and Majority Leader Joseph Bruno, all but two--Roy Goodman of Manhattan and Frank Padavan of Queens--picked Bruno. Senate Democrats offered the usual litany of arguments in support of rent controls: that rent-regulated tenants are predominantly working-class and poor, that people are already tripled up in $1,100 a month one-bedroom apartments, that vacancy decontrol was a disaster when Governor Nelson Rockefeller pushed it through in 1971. "We're not dealing with Barbra Streisand in Cambria Heights," said Alton Waldon of Queens. "This is the haves versus the have-nots." Bruno accused them of "grandstanding, posturing, and pandering." He emphasized his willingness to be "reasonable," |
|
saying he had "offered since December to
negotiate" a slow death for rent controls
rather than an instantan-eous execution.
"This will not be a debate on the merits of rent control," he declared, and the Senate Republicans ovinely obeyed. Even Goodman and Padavan didn't say a word about the bill on the floor. "They only voted for it because Bruno allowed them to," said Jenny Laurie of the Metropolitan Council on Housing. Tenants lobbying other metropolitan- area Republican Senators didn't meet much success. Goodman emphasized his support for rent controls, but told ten-ants that he would not try to get other Republicans to break with Bruno. Nicholas Spano of Westchester told a group of about 25 constituents that he was "firmly in favor" of renewing the rent laws, but wouldn't vote for the discharge petition because it was "designed to embarrass the majority." Spano, who received $8,650 from landlord groups between 1993 and 1996, told the tenants they were being manipulated in a "political charade." |
The 40 tenants visiting
Bronx-Westchester Senator Guy Velella
were ordered to leave by a state trooper.
Velella received $3,000 from landlord
groups, and also chairs the Senate
Republican Campaign Committee, which got
$430,000.
Other area Republicans voting against the bill were Dean ($4,700) Skelos and Michael ($4,550) Tully of Nassau County, John ($2,100) Marchi of Staten Island, and Serphin ($9,150) Maltese of Queens. Brooklyn Democrat John Sampson, a former landlord lawyer, wavered, first attempting to leave the chamber and then asking to abstain before he was pushed back in line by the party organization. "If they don't feel your anger, we're going to lose," Michael McKee of the New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition told tenants after the vote. But tenant organizers warn against focusing anger exclusively on Joseph Bruno. The upstate millionaire is easy to hate--for those of you who've never seen him in the flesh, he radiates the smugness of the successful class warrior, like a unionbusting executive who ponti-ficates about his great concern for job security while denouncing "1930s socialist relics" that force businessmen to pay |
|
lazy lowlifes far more than they could
ever
command on the free market. Yet many feel
he is simply playing bad cop for
Pataki--attracting tenant ire by being an
outrageous pig, thus giving the Governor
the opportunity to look like a great
conciliator when he proposes some
"compromise" like vacancy decontrol.
That scenario looks increasingly like-ly, as it also seems to enjoy the support of Rudy Giuliani. (The Mayor has appointed anti-rent control zealots to run the city's rent-stabilization system, but needs to look pro-tenant to win re-election.) Bruno is likely to do everything in his power to prevent a straight up-and-down vote on renewing the laws intact: The Republicans have a five-vote majority in the State Senate, and there are eight GOP members from the metropolitan area who have |
significant numbers of renters in their districts.
Such a compromise would probably include such devastating loopholes as lowering the "luxury decontrol" threshold--from $2,000 a month to $1,000--or vacancy decontrol (either completely deregulating vacant apartments, as was done here in 1971, or the San Francisco system of allowing landlords to charge new tenants as much as they can get but limiting increases for tenants in place). The 1971 decontrol, which coincided with the era of massive abandonment and gave landlords a powerful incentive to harass tenants out of their homes, was such a disaster that it inspired a Republican-dominated state government to put most apartments under rent stabilization three years later. That hasn't prevented landlord propagandists from claiming that "it doesn't hurt tenants in place." Pataki has endorsed vacancy decontrol in the past. His office did not return phone calls about his position. |
SHADOW|SHADOW Mail Order|SHADOW Staff|MediaFilter|"> PoMoWar|Artists on MediaFilter|CHAOS|WarZone MediaFilter Chat